- Adobe premiere max osx 10.9 mac os x#
- Adobe premiere max osx 10.9 pro#
- Adobe premiere max osx 10.9 software#
- Adobe premiere max osx 10.9 mac#
So we used it in our last graph to highlight the advantage of the 'late 2013' Mac Pro's slowest pair of GPUs (FirePro D300s). LuxMark is one of the few OpenCL benchmarks that uses multiple GPUs. For under the preferences section is where you would navigate for the previous Lync 2011 Mac client. Figure 1 Once we go to preferences, you will need to select the General Icon. However, it only 'blew away' the iMac in three GPU intensive tests - two of which utilize the dual GPUs. The 2013 with dual FirePro D300 GPUs beat the 2013 with the single GeForce GTX 780M GPU in 8 out of 12 of the tests featured above. I did post this to an Adobe form but there was zero response:-(.
I suspect Premiere is not using them at all. That is why I wonder if there is a way to measure their activity. It is as if the 4096 GPUs on the D-700s aren't being used at all.
Adobe premiere max osx 10.9 pro#
So getting a Mac Pro speeded up AME by about 15% despite the hardware being much, much better. I have now done some careful timing tests of AME CS6 & AME CC on Mac Pro and AME CS6 on a much slower Windows machine with quad core, 18 GB RAM, slower SSD and only 256 GPUs.ĬS6 on the Mac Pro is slightly faster than CC on the Mac Pro and slightly slower than CS6 on Windows. Did I just waste 6500 euros on the Mac Pro or am I using the wrong settings.
What could be the problem? This is my first test of Premiere and it is kind of disappointing. The bottleneck wasn't the CPU, the memory, or the disk. Does Premiere get tired in the evenings? The internal SSD runs at 900 MB/s and there was no transcoding to do. Should Premiere Pro be this slow on hardware that is blindingly fast? Is there some secret box 'Use all the cores and all allowed memory' that I have to check (I set the preferences to allow Adobe to use 52 GB). Then I did it again with 1-pass VBR and it took 9:56. My 4-year-old Windows machine using CS6 could do that. The time to encode the timeline of 9:47 was 21:28. No other programs except Premiere, AME, and the activity monitor were open during encoding and I was just sitting there watching it lumber along. While encoding, the CPU was running 50-70% idle (!!!) so it was using only 2-3 cores and half the memory (32GB) was unused. The output was written to the internal SSD. I queued this for Adobe Media Encoder CC at H.264, 1080p25, 24 Mbps VBR 2 pass.Īudio was 192 kbps, 48 kHZ,stereo. For the most part, it just had to copy the trimmed input clips to the output. I edited this in Premiere Pro and added small adjustments (mostly changes of levels) in about 20 clips. The input-entirely stored on the internal SSD no external disk was even connected-was about 100 clips shot as AVCHD (1080p25 PAL) at 24 Mbps. I tried Premiere Pro CC today for the first time. The configuration is 6 cores 3.5 GHz, 64 GB RAM, 2 x D700 graphics, 1 TB internal SSD. I have many projects in Premiere and don't want to switch to FCP. (This issue is fixed in the Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5 (5.5.2) update.) In Adobe Premiere Pro CS5, the Eyedropper tool (for example, for the Ultra Key effect) does not behave correctly on a system with multiple monitors with different vertical resolutions.Ī month ago I bought a 2013 Mac Pro mostly for running Premiere Pro CC. In Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5, the Timecode effect doesn't render a timecode overlay. Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2015, Adobe Premiere Pro CC’s June, 2016 release.
Adobe premiere max osx 10.9 software#
Software The following software versions are recommended for use with this installer: Adobe
Adobe premiere max osx 10.9 mac os x#
This driver version is compatible with Mac OS X 10.9.5 (Mavericks), OS X 10.10 (Yosemite), and OS X 10.11.x (El Capitan).
0 kommentar(er)
